Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to Al Irsyad: Jurnal Studi Islam undergo a rigorous peer-review process to ensure the quality and academic validity of the published research. The journal employs a double-blind peer-review system, in which the identities of authors and reviewers are kept confidential. The review process is conducted by experts in the relevant fields of study, who evaluate manuscripts based on their scholarly quality, originality, and alignment with the journal's scope.

  1. Initial Evaluation: Upon receipt, the editorial board conducts an initial screening to ensure the manuscript meets the journal's focus and scope and complies with the author guidelines. Manuscripts with a similarity index exceeding 30% will be rejected at this stage. Formatting and citation style are also checked. If discrepancies are found, the manuscript will be returned to the author for correction. Manuscripts that pass this stage proceed to the review phase.

  2. Reviewer Assignment: The editorial board selects five independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field and experienced in the manuscript's research topic. The identities of authors and reviewers are concealed. The title page containing author names, acknowledgements, and contribution references must be submitted separately. Invited reviewers should ideally be affiliated with institutions different from those of the corresponding author. Reviewer invitations are aimed to be completed within two weeks.

  3. Review Process: Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on its scholarly quality, originality, methodological validity, and relevance to the field. The standard review period is two weeks. Reviewers provide constructive feedback and may recommend acceptance, rejection, or revision of the manuscript.

  4. Decision: The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision based on the reviewers' feedback and the manuscript's compliance with publication policies. If the reviewer comments conflict significantly, the editor may invite an additional reviewer. The decision (reject, accept, or revise) and the reviewers' comments are communicated to the author via the online system. The average time from submission to first decision is one month, and from acceptance to publication is 8 weeks (2 months).

  5. Revision Process: If a manuscript is accepted with revisions, the author is requested to revise it based on the reviewers' feedback and resubmit. The resubmission must include the revised manuscript with tracked changes and a rebuttal letter. The standard revision period is two weeks for minor revisions and four weeks for major revisions. Manuscripts with major revisions will be reviewed again by the same reviewers.

  6. Publication: Once accepted, authors are required to submit a final version of their manuscript for final editing and formatting. Before proceeding to publication, the revised manuscript must meet the final originality threshold, with a maximum similarity score (similarity index) of 20%..

.

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement for the Peer-Review Process

Al Irsyad: Jurnal Studi Islam is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and preventing malpractice in the peer-review process. The principles we adhere to are:

  1. Confidentiality: The entire review process is confidential. Editors, reviewers, and relevant parties must maintain the confidentiality of all manuscript-related information.

  2. Objectivity and Impartiality: Reviews are conducted objectively and without bias. Evaluation is based on scholarly merit, relevance, and quality, free from conflicts of interest. Feedback provided should be constructive.

  3. Timeliness: The review process is conducted within a reasonable timeframe. Authors are regularly informed about the status of their manuscript.

  4. Transparency and Accountability: The review process must be transparent and accountable. Reviewers are encouraged to provide clear, evidence-based, and constructive comments. Editorial decisions should be fair and based on reviewer feedback and editorial expertise.

  5. Conflict of Interest: Editors and reviewers must declare any potential conflicts of interest that could affect their objectivity. If a conflict of interest is identified, steps will be taken to ensure an impartial evaluation.

  6. Plagiarism and Misconduct: Editors and reviewers must be vigilant in identifying potential plagiarism, data fabrication, or other research misconduct. Any suspected misconduct must be reported to the relevant authorities.

  7. Reviewer Recognition: Al Irsyad: Jurnal Studi Islam values the crucial contribution of peer reviewers. The journal will provide appropriate recognition and appreciation for their dedication to the publication process.

By adhering to these principles, Al Irsyad: Jurnal Studi Islam is dedicated to maintaining the integrity and credibility of the peer-review process, ensuring fairness, transparency, and ethical conduct in manuscript evaluation, thereby upholding the quality and trustworthiness of the published research.